Arlo vs April — which AI assistant fits your work?

You text both April and Arlo like a person, but they're built for different jobs. April, from goapril.ai, is a lightweight AI executive assistant that lives entirely in your text messages — no app to install, no dashboard to learn. Arlo is an AI colleague for work that runs across the channels your team already uses, takes real actions through governed tool access, and logs everything it does.

Want a simple personal EA you can text and forget about? April is a clean, honest choice. Want an assistant your whole team can lean on inside real workflows, with reviewer approvals and a full audit trail? That's the gap Arlo fills. Both are good products; they're just aimed at different people.

What April is (as of 2026)

As of 2026, April positions itself as an AI executive assistant that lives in the one app everyone already has open: Messages. From its public materials:

• It works entirely over text messages, with nothing to install and no separate app to open.
• It's aimed at individuals who want a simple, minimalist personal assistant.
• Its pitch is ease: you text it the way you'd text a human EA, and it handles the back-and-forth.
• Public pricing lists a free start (around the first 50 messages) and then a flat monthly plan (about $25/month) for unlimited use.

Public detail on April is limited, so treat the specifics above as its stated positioning rather than an exhaustive feature list. What April clearly does well is keep things dead simple: one thread, one person, no setup. If that's what you want, check April's own site for the current state before you decide.

What Arlo is

Arlo is one AI colleague for the whole workspace, and there's no separate chat app to live in. It works inside the tools a team already uses: iMessage and SMS, Slack, Microsoft Teams, and live phone calls. It remembers context across conversations and sends a single morning briefing of what changed overnight.

It connects to Slack, Gmail, Notion, Linear, GitHub, and 3,000+ other tools. For software with no API, it logs in once through a secure browser session and clicks, reads, and fills out forms the way a person would. So the work isn't limited to what a chat integration exposes.

Governance is the part that sets it apart, and it's on by default. Every send and every tool write pauses for a reviewer you pick. Each tool call, source, and approval lands in a full audit trail you can go back and read. That's a different posture than a personal texting assistant, and it's deliberate.

Feature comparison

Capability	April (personal)	Arlo (work / teams)
Primary audience	Individual consumers	Teams and businesses
Where you reach it	Text messages only	iMessage and SMS, Slack, Microsoft Teams
Live phone calls	Not a stated focus	Yes — inbound and outbound calls
Persistent memory	Not a stated focus	Yes, plus a morning briefing of changes
Integrations	Not a stated focus	3,000+ tools
No-API tool access	Not a stated focus	Yes — secure browser sessions
Approval before sending	Not a stated focus	Yes — every send and write awaits a reviewer
Audit trail	Not a stated focus	Full trace of calls, sources, approvals
Admin policy / roles / SSO	Not a stated focus	Yes, on the Business plan
Pricing	~50 messages free, then ~$25/mo (as of 2026)	Free; Pro $20/mo; Max $100–$200/mo

This table reflects each product's stated positioning as of 2026. "Not a stated focus" for April means its public materials emphasize a simple personal EA over text, not that a capability is impossible.

Which one is right for you

Pick April for yourself. One clean text thread that handles your personal errands, scheduling, and reminders, with nothing to configure and no controls to babysit. If simplicity over a single channel is the whole point, that's exactly what April is for.

Pick Arlo when the assistant acts for a team and the work carries stakes. Its reach across Slack, Microsoft Teams, and the phone, plus its governance model, are built for shared, accountable work. When an assistant sends an email to a client, updates a CRM, or makes a call on your behalf, you want the approval step and the record — and that's the mode Arlo runs in by default.

On pricing, both are straightforward. April is a flat personal subscription as of 2026. Arlo starts free, with Claude-style usage tiers — Pro at $20/month, Max at $100 or $200/month — and a custom Business plan adding admin policy, roles, SSO, and audit export for orgs that need them.

Governance is the real difference

A personal assistant optimizes for one user's convenience. An AI colleague has to hold up in front of teammates, customers, and auditors, and that changes what the product has to do. Arlo treats every action as something that might need review: sensitive steps wait on an approver you name, and the audit trace records what happened and why. That's why you can point Arlo at real, shared workflows and not just personal to-dos — and it's the honest line between the two products.

Still weighing options? See our head-to-head Arlo vs Poke, our roundup of the best AI executive assistants, or the AI executive assistant explainer.

Try Arlo

If you need an AI colleague that works inside your team's tools with an approval before every send and a full audit trail, try Arlo.